Category Archives: TSA

Ron Paul Arrested By TSA! “Police State? Really?”

Wake up America!

Ron Paul Slams “Out Of Control Police State” After Rand Paul Detained By TSA

Congressman renews his call to abolish agency that “gropes and grabs” Americans

Steve Watson
Infowars.com
January 23, 2012

GOP presidential candidate Ron Paul issued the following statement on his campaign website this afternoon, following his son Rand’s treatment at the hands of the TSA in Nashville.

“The police state in this country is growing out of control.  One of the ultimate embodiments of this is the TSA that gropes and grabs our children, our seniors, and our loved ones and neighbors with disabilities.  The TSA does all of this while doing nothing to keep us safe.

“That is why my ‘Plan to Restore America,’ in additional to cutting $1 trillion dollars in federal spending in one year, eliminates the TSA.

“We must restore the freedom and respect for liberty that once made American the greatest nation in human history.  I am deeply committed to doing that as President of the United States.”

The website also posted a picture of Senator Rand Paul talking to reporters following the incident with the TSA:

Congressman Paul has been a long time critic of the TSA. In 2010 he introduced into the House the “American Traveler Dignity Act,” which would remove TSA agents’ immunity from prosecution for implementing invasive pat-down procedures. Paul re-introduced the legislation in the summer.

Related: TSA Directly Violated US Constitution By Detaining Senator Rand Paul

 

The Tentacles of George Soros!

DAVOS/SWITZERLAND, 27JAN10 - George Soros, Cha...
Image via Wikipedia

Why Don’t We Hear About Soros’ Ties to Over 30 Major News Organizations?

By Dan Gainor

Published May 11, 2011

| FoxNews.com

AP

Editor’s note: This is the first of a two part series on George Soros and the media.

When liberal investor George Soros gave $1.8 million to National Public Radio , it became part of the firestorm of controversy that jeopardized NPR’s federal funding. But that gift only hints at the widespread influence the controversial billionaire has on the mainstream media. Soros, who spent $27 million trying to defeat President Bush in 2004, has ties to more than 30 mainstream news outlets – including The New York Times, Washington Post, the Associated Press, NBC and ABC.

Prominent journalists like ABC’s Christiane Amanpour and former Washington Post editor and now Vice President Len Downie serve on boards of operations that take Soros cash. This despite the Society of Professional Journalists‘ ethical code stating: “avoid all conflicts real or perceived.”

This information is part of an upcoming report by the Media Research Centers Business & Media Institute which has been looking into George Soros and his influence on the media.

The investigative reporting start-up ProPublica is a prime example. ProPublica, which recently won its second Pulitzer Prize, initially was given millions of dollars from the Sandler Foundation to “strengthen the progressive infrastructure” – “progressive” being the code word for very liberal. In 2010, it also received a two-year contribution of $125,000 each year from the Open Society Foundations. In case you wonder where that money comes from, the OSF website is www.soros.org. It is a network of more than 30 international foundations, mostly funded by Soros, who has contributed more than $8 billion to those efforts.

The ProPublica stories are thoroughly researched by top-notch staffers who used to work at some of the biggest news outlets in the nation. But the topics are almost laughably left-wing. The site’s proud list of  “Our Investigations” includes attacks on oil companies, gas companies, the health care industry, for-profit schools and more. More than 100 stories on the latest lefty cause: opposition to drilling for natural gas by hydraulic fracking. Another 100 on the evils of the foreclosure industry.

Throw in a couple investigations making the military look bad and another about prisoners at Guantanamo Bay and you have almost the perfect journalism fantasy – a huge budget, lots of major media partners and a liberal agenda unconstrained by advertising.

One more thing: a 14-person Journalism Advisory Board, stacked with CNN’s David Gergen and representatives from top newspapers, a former publisher of The Wall Street Journal and the editor-in-chief of Simon & Schuster. Several are working journalists, including:

.

ProPublica is far from the only Soros-funded organization that is stacked with members of the supposedly neutral press.

The Center for Public Integrity is another great example. Its board of directors is filled with working journalists like Amanpour from ABC, right along side blatant liberal media types like Arianna Huffington, of the Huffington Post and now AOL.

Like ProPublica, the CPI board is a veritable Who’s Who of journalism and top media organizations, including:

• Christiane Amanpour – Anchor of ABC’s Sunday morning political affairs program, “This Week with Christiane Amanpour.” A reliable lefty, she has called tax cuts “giveaways,” the Tea Partyextreme,” and Obama “very Reaganesque.

• Paula Madison – Executive vice president and chief diversity officer for NBC Universal, who leads NBC Universal’s corporate diversity initiatives, spanning all broadcast television, cable, digital, and film properties.

• Matt Thompson – Editorial product manager at National Public Radio and an adjunct faculty member at the prominent Poynter Institute.

The group’s advisory board features:

• Ben Sherwood, ABC News president and former “Good Morning America” executive producer

Once again, like ProPublica, the Center for Public Integrity’s investigations are mostly liberal – attacks on the coal industry, payday loans and conservatives like Mississippi Gov. Haley Barbour. The Center for Public Integrity is also more open about its politics, including a detailed investigation into conservative funders David and Charles Koch and their “web of influence.”According to the center’s own 990 tax forms, the Open Society Institute gave it $651,650 in 2009 alone.

The well-known Center for Investigative Reporting follows the same template – important journalists on the board and a liberal editorial agenda. Both the board of directors and the advisory board contain journalists from major news outlets. The board features:

Readers of the site are greeted with numerous stories on climate change, illegal immigration and the evils of big companies. It counts among its media partners The Washington Post, Salon, CNN and ABC News. CIR received close to $1 million from Open Society from 2003 to 2008.

Why does it all matter? Journalists, we are constantly told, are neutral in their reporting. In almost the same breath, many bemoan the influence of money in politics. It is a maxim of both the left and many in the media that conservatives are bought and paid for by business interests. Yet where are the concerns about where their money comes from?

Fred Brown, who recently revised the book “Journalism Ethics: A Casebook of Professional Conduct for News Media,” argues journalists need to be “transparent” about their connections and “be up front about your relationship” with those who fund you.

Unfortunately, that rarely happens. While the nonprofits list who sits on their boards, the news outlets they work for make little or no effort to connect those dots. Amanpour’s biography page, for instance, talks about her lengthy career, her time at CNN and her many awards. It makes no mention of her affiliation with the Center for Public Integrity.

If journalists were more up front, they would have to admit numerous uncomfortable connections with groups that push a liberal agenda, many of them funded by the stridently liberal George Soros. So don’t expect that transparency any time soon.

Dan Gainor is the Boone Pickens Fellow and the Media Research Center’s Vice President for Business and Culture. He writes frequently for Fox News Opinion. He can also be contacted on FaceBook and Twitter as dangainor.

Read more: http://www.foxnews.com/opinion/2011/05/11/dont-hear-george-soros-ties-30-major-news-organizations/#ixzz1MCbd2aSw

Lie After Lie, Transparent Government!

Update: Chronicle responds after Obama Administration punishes reporter for using multimedia, then claims they didn’t

 Update: In a pants-on-fire moment, the White House press office today denied anyone there had issued threats to remove Carla Marinucci and possibly other Hearst reporters from the press pool covering the President in the Bay Area.

Chronicle editor Ward Bushee called the press office on its fib:

Sadly, we expected the White House to respond in this manner based on our experiences yesterday. It is not a truthful response. It follows a day of off-the-record exchanges with key people in the White House communications office who told us they would remove our reporter, then threatened retaliation to Chronicle and Hearst reporters if we reported on the ban, and then recanted to say our reporter might not be removed after all.

The Chronicle’s report is accurate.

If the White House has indeed decided not to ban our reporter, we would like an on-the-record notice that she will remain the San Francisco print pool reporter.

I was on some of those calls and can confirm Ward’s statement.

Messy ball now firmly in White House court.

—–

The hip, transparent and social media-loving Obama administration is showing its analog roots. And maybe even some hypocrisy highlights.

White House officials have banished one of the best political reporters in the country from the approved pool of journalists covering presidential visits to the Bay Area for using now-standard multimedia tools to gather the news.

The Chronicle’s Carla Marinucci – who, like many contemporary reporters, has a phone with video capabilities on her at all times –shot some protesters interrupting an Obama fundraiser at the St. Regis Hotel.

She was part of a “print pool” – a limited number of journalists at an event who represent their bigger hoard colleagues – which White House press officials still refer to quaintly as “pen and pad” reporting.

But that’s a pretty Flintstones concept of journalism for an administration that presents itself as the Jetsons. Video is every bit a part of any journalist’s tool kit these days as a functioning pen that doesn’t leak through your pocket.

In fact, Carla and her reporting colleague, Joe Garofoli, founded something called “Shaky Hand Productions” – the semi-pro, sometimes vertiginous use of a Flip or phone camera by Hearst reporters to catch more impromptu or urgent moments during last year’s California gubernatorial race that might otherwise be missed by TV.

The name has become its own brand; often politicians even ask if anyone from Shaky Hand will show at their event. For Carla, Joe and reporters at other Hearst newsrooms where Shaky Hand has taken hold, this was an appropriate dive into use of other media by traditional journalists catering to audiences who expect their news delivered in all modes and manners.

That’s the world we live in and the President of the United States claims to be one of its biggest advocates.

Just the day before Carla’s Stone Age infraction, Mr. Obama was at Facebook seated next to its founder, Mark Zuckerberg, and may as well have been wearing an “I’m With Mark” t-shirt for all the mutual admiration going back and forth.

“The main reason we wanted to do this is,” Obama said of his appearance, “first of all, because more and more people, especially young people, are getting their information through different media. And historically, part of what makes for a healthy democracy, what is good politics, is when you’ve got citizens who are informed, who are engaged.”

Informed, in other words, through social and other digital media where videos of news are posted.

The President and his staffers deftly used social media like Twitter and Facebook in his election campaign and continue to extol the virtues and value. Except, apparently, when it comes to the press.

So what’s up with the White House? We can’t say because neither Press Secretary Jay Carney nor anyone from his staff would speak on the record.

Other sources confirmed that Carla was vanquished, including Chronicle editor Ward Bushee, who said he was “informed that Carla was removed as a pool reporter.” Which shouldn’t be a secret in any case because it’s a fact that affects the newsgathering of our largest regional paper (and sfgate)and how local citizens get their information.

What’s worse: more than a few journalists familiar with this story are aware of some implied threats from the White House of additional and wider punishment if Carla’s spanking became public. Really? That’s a heavy hand usually reserved for places other than the land of the free.

But bravery is a challenge, in particular for White House correspondents, most of whom are seasoned and capable journalists. They live a little bit in a gilded cage where they have access to the most powerful man in the world but must obey the rules whether they make sense or not.

CBS News reporter, Mark Knoller, has publicly protested the limited press access to Obama fundraisers, calling the policy “inconsistent.” “It’s no way to do business,” wrote Politico’s Julie Mason, “especially [for] a candidate who prides himself on transparency.”

A 2009 blog by the White House Director of New Media states that “President Obama is committed to making his administration the most open and transparent in history.”

Not last week.

Mason referred to the San Francisco St. Regis protest as “a highly newsworthy event” where “reporters had to rely on written pool reports…”

Except, thanks to Carla’s quick action with her camera, they didn’t.

I get that all powerful people and institutions want to control their image and their message. That’s part of their job, to create a mythology that allows them to continue being powerful.

But part of the press’ job is to do the opposite, to strip away the cloaks and veneers. By banning her, and by not acknowledging how contemporary media works, the White House did not just put Carla in a cage but more like one of those stifling pens reserved for calves on their way to being veal.

Carla cannot do her job to the best of her ability if she can’t use all the tools available to her as a journalist. The public still sees the videos posted by protesters and other St. Regis attendees, because the technology is ubiquitous. But the Obama Administration apparently wants to give the distinct advantage to citizen witnesses at the expense of professionals.

Why? Well, they won’t tell us.

Some White House reporters are grumbling almost as much as the Administration about Carla’s “breaking the rules.” I can understand how they’d be irritated. If you didn’t get the video because you understood you weren’t supposed to, why should someone else get it who isn’t following the longstanding civilized table manners?

The White House Press Correspondents’ Association pool reporting guidelines warn about “no hoarding” of information and also say, “pool reports must be filed before any online story or blog.” While uploading her video probably was the best way to file her report, Carla may have technically busted the letter of that law.

But the guidelines also say, “Print poolers can snap pictures or take video. They are not obliged to share these pictures…but can make them available if they so choose.”

Then what guidelines is the White House applying here? Again, we don’t know.

What the Administration should have done is to use this incident to precipitate a reasonable conversation about changing their 1950’s policies into rules more suited to 2011. Dwight Eisenhower was the last President who let some new media air into the room when he lifted the ban on cameras at press conferences in 1952.

“We’ve come full circle here,” Tom Rosenstiel, director of the Pew Foundation’s Project for Excellence in Journalism told me today. “A newspaper reporter is being punished because she took pictures with a moving camera. We live in a world where there are no longer distinctions. The White House is trying to live by 20th century distinctions.”

The President’s practice not just with transparency but in other dealings with the press has not been tracking his words, despite the cool glamour and easy conversation that makes him seem so much more open than the last guy.

It was his administration that decided to go after New York Times reporter James Risen to get at his source in a book he wrote about the CIA. For us here in SF who went through the BALCO case and other fisticuffs with the George W. Bush Attorney General’s prosecutors, this is deja vu.

Late today, there were hints that the White House might be backing off the Carla Fatwa.

Barack Obama sold himself successfully as a fresh wind for the 21st century. In important matters of communication, technology, openness and the press, it’s not too late for him to demonstrate that.

Posted By: Phil Bronstein (Email, Twitter) | April 28 2011 at 04:48 PM

I Told You So!

An image of a TSA screener inspecting a servic...
Image via Wikipedia

I posted this when it happened back in April 13, 2011, and as much as I ate to say it,”I TOLD YOU SO,” here is an up-date of newest attack on our children by TSA. STOP the madness; Scream out IT COULD HAPPEN TO YOUR CHILD!

Now If You Have Forgotten Look at the Video Below, Than Read the Articale and call your GOVERNMENT and SCREAM at them for allowing this to HAPPEN!

TSA officer Thomas Gordon Jr. is being held.

Posted on Sat, Apr. 23, 2011

 

Airport passenger screener charged in distributing child pornography

By John Shiffman

Inquirer Staff Writer

A passenger screener at Philadelphia International Airport is facing charges that he distributed more than 100 images of child pornography via Facebook, records show.

Federal agents also allege that Transportation Safety Administration Officer Thomas Gordon Jr. of Philadelphia, who routinely searched airline passengers, uploaded explicit pictures of young girls to an Internet site on which he also posted a photograph of himself in his TSA uniform.

Homeland Security agents arrested the TSA officer March 24, and he is being held without bail.

Although the case was unsealed Thursday, neither the indictment nor the news release mentioned Gordon’s job searching airline passengers for TSA.

The arrest comes as TSA grapples with several other incidents involving screeners, including a YouTube video posted last week by parents angry about the pat-down their 6-year-old daughter received at an airport in New Orleans. TSA officials said the pat-down was proper; the parents said the girl was “groped.”

Citing privacy rules, TSA spokeswoman Ann Davis would not say if Gordon has been suspended from his job, but noted that he had been in federal custody since his arrest.

“We can assure the public that he is no longer working at the airport,” Davis said.

Gordon began working as a TSA screener at the Philadelphia airport in December 2005, Davis said. The airport has 900 screeners, she said.

If convicted of the child pornography charges, Gordon, 46, faces a minimum mandatory sentence of five years. The maximum prison term is 250 years and the top fine is $3.2 million.

Gordon is paid $37,000 annually as a TSA screener, records show. He has no prior criminal record, officials said.

Assistant U.S. Attorney Michael Levy, chief of his office’s child exploitation unit, declined to comment Friday.

Gordon’s lawyer, Elizabeth Toplin, an assistant federal public defender, could not be reached for comment via e-mail or phone late Friday.

Tipped by the Delaware County District Attorney’s Office, federal agents began investigating Gordon on March 10, according to an affidavit from a Homeland Security Investigations agent.

The tip allegedly included evidence that Gordon had uploaded five explicit photographs of young girls onto the web site Photobucket.

The federal agent alleged that Gordon’s Photobucket account also included a picture of him wearing his blue TSA uniform.

The indictment alleges that Gordon used at least six Facebook accounts and employed multiple names “to upload and store images of sexual exploitation of minor children.”

The charges detail 104 illicit photographs allegedly uploaded over four weeks in February.

Authorities also seized from Gordon an HP laptop and a four-gigabyte flash drive that they say contained more than 600 images or movies containing child pornography, according to court filings.

Gordon’s job as a TSA screener was in jeopardy last year for unrelated reasons, according to an online newsletter of the American Federation of Government Employees.

Citing a family issue, it said Gordon was having “difficulty maintaining his work schedule.” The union lawyer helped convince TSA officials that a change in shift schedule resolved the problem, the newsletter said, and Gordon returned to work.

NOW SAY TO YOURSELVES DID HE EVER PAT DOWN MY CHILD?

 

Understanding Muhammad

Medieval Christian views on Muhammad
Image via Wikipedia

The Post you are about to read is true and is based on true research. This post will open the eyes of the reader and at worst will make you think? 

Alisina.org ~ Everything You Need to Know about Islam

Understanding Muhammad

The fifth edition of Understanding Muhammad has 25% more content than the previous edition, including a new chapter that leaves no doubt about Muhammad’s psychopathology. ThIS edition is available only in hard copy. If for any reason you can’t get this book write to me and I will email you a PDF version of the previous edition.

Since September 11, 2001, there have been over 16,000 terrorist attacks, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians and a lot more injuries, throughout the world. The perpetrators of these crimes were not monsters; they were Muslims. They were pious people who believed and acted in accordance with their faith. There are millions more who think like them and are ready to do the same.

If you think Islamic terrorism is a new phenomenon, think again. Islam owes its success to terrorism.  The prophet of Islam bragged, “I have been made victorious with terror“.  [Bukhari: 4.52. 220]  Since the day Muhammad set foot in Medina, he started his campaign of terror.  His followers have been doing the same ever since.

Muslims are intolerant, supremacist, bully, and violent.  They are highly inflammable and can explode if they are not treated preferentially and with respect.  At the same time, they abuse others.  This is psychopathology.

To understand Muslims, one must understand their prophet.  Muslims worship and emulate Muhammad.  Islam is Muhammadanism.  Only by understanding him can one know what makes them tick.

Understanding Muhammad is a psychobiography of Allah’s Prophet.  Historians tell us that Muhammad used to withdraw to a cave, spending days wrapped in his thoughts.  He heard bells ringing and had ghostly visions.  He thought he had become demon possessed, but his wife reassured him that he had become a prophet.  Convinced of his status, he was intolerant of those who rejected him, assassinated those who criticized him, raided, looted, and massacred entire populations.  He reduced thousands to slavery, raped, and allowed his men to rape female captives.  All of this, he did with a clear conscience and a sense of entitlement.

He was magnanimous to those who admired him, but vengeful to those who did not.  He believed he was the most perfect human creation and the universe’s raison d’être.  Muhammad was no ordinary man.  He was a psychopathic Understanding Muhammad, ventures beyond the stories.  Focusing on the “why” rather than the “what,” it unravels the mystique of the most influential and yet enigmatic man in history.

Muhammad believed in his own cause.  He was so certain of the reality of his hallucinations that he expected everyone to believe in them too.   He would make his Allah indignantly ask “What! Do you then dispute with him [Muhammad] as to what he saw?” (Q.53:12)  This is psychopathology.  Why should others believe in what he saw?  Wasn’t it up to him to prove what he saw was real?  Only a psychopathic narcissist expects others to believe in his claims without asking for evidence.

Muhammad was an orphan.  Spurned by his mother in his infancy and left in the care of a Bedouin couple, he had a loveless childhood.  He then passed to the care of his grandfather and uncle who took pity on him and spoiled him.  Not receiving love at a time he needed unconditional love and not receiving discipline when he needed to learn about boundaries, he developed narcissistic personality disorder, a trait that made him a megalomaniac bereft of conscience.  He fantasized about unlimited power, expected praise and admiration, believed he was special, and expected others to believe him and go along with his ideas and plans.  He took advantage of others, was jealous, yet believed others were jealous of him, and was hurt when rejected, even killing those who deserted him.  He lied and deceived, feeling entitled and justified in doing so. All these are traits of narcissistic personality disorder.

Thanks to another mental illness, temporal lobe epilepsy, the prophet of Islam had vivid hallucinations which he interpreted as mystical and divine intimations.   When he claimed he heard voices, saw angels and other ghostly entities, he was not lying.  He could not distinguish reality from fantasy.

Muhammad also suffered from obsessive compulsive disorder, causing his fixation on numbers, rituals and stringent rules.  OCD explains why he lived such an austere life and why his religion is filled with so many absurd rules.

In late life Muhammad was affected by acromegaly, a disease caused by excessive production of a growth hormone, resulting in large bones, cold and fleshy hands and feet and coarse facial features such as enlarged lips, nose and tongue. Acromegaly occurs after the age of 40 and usually kills the patient in his early 60s.  It causes impotence, while TLE increases libido.  This explains Muhammad’s sexual vagaries in his old age and why he had such an insatiable craving for sex.  He would visit all his 9 wives in one night to touch and fondle them, without having intercourse.  His impotence explains his insecurity, paranoia, and intense jealousy for his young wives. He ordered them to cover themselves, lest other men cast a lusting eye on them.  Today, half a billion Muslim women veil themselves, because Muhammad was impotent.  Muhammad’s illnesses explain a lot of mysteries of Islam.

The combination of all these psychological disorders and his unusual physiognomy made Muhammad a phenomenon that set him apart from ordinary people.  His uneducated followers interpreted his differences as signs of his prophethood.  Like devotees of all cults, they rose to champion his cause with dedication.  By defying death and butchering others they made Islam the world’s second largest religion, now the biggest threat to world peace and the survival of human civilization.

Why is it important to know Muhammad?  Because over a billion people try to be like him and do as he did. Consequently, the insanity of one man is bequeathed to all his followers.  It is by understanding him that we can see through them, and be able to predict these unpredictable people.

We live in a dangerous time.  When a fifth of humanity worships a psychopath, eulogizes suicide bombing and thinks killing and martyrdom are ultimate acts of piety, the world becomes a dangerous place.  When these people acquire the atomic bomb, the earth becomes a powder keg.

Islam is a cult. It is time to wake up and realize that this cult is a threat to mankind and there can be no co-existence with Muslims. As long as Muslims believe in Muhammad, they are a threat to others and to themselves.  Muslims must leave Islam, leave their culture of hate and join the rest of mankind as fellow humans, or non-Muslims must separate themselves from them, ban Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and send home those who plot against democracy and refuse to integrate.

Islam is incompatible with democracy.  It is a warring creed that uses democracy to destroy it and to establish itself as a worldwide totalitarian regime.  The only way to avert the clash between this barbarity and civilization and a world disaster, is to expose the fallacy of Islam and demystify it.  Muslims must be weaned from Islam for humanity to live in peace.

Understanding Muhammad is imperative for both Muslims and non-Muslims. This book makes that task easy.

Reviews of Understanding Muhammad

1 FJordman

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/10/fjordman-reviews-ali-sinas-understanding-muhammad.html

http://lionheartuk.blogspot.com/2008/10/fjordman-book-review-understanding.html

2-  Sujit Das

http://islammonitor.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2436&catid=214

http://voi.org/28jun2009/sourced/faithfreedom/bookreview:understandingmuhammadapsychobiography.html

http://thewestislamandsharia.blogspot.com/2010/04/book-review-understanding-muhammad.html

3- Mahesh Prabhu

http://www.faithfreedom.org/features/book-review/understanding-muhammad-a-psychobiography-of-allah’s-prophet/

http://indiamahesh.folks.co.in/2010/07/an-impeccable-reassessment-of-islam’s-only-prophet/

4- Tamilian ex-Muslim

http://www.islam-watch.org/Library/Understanding-Muhammad-Tamil.htm

http://www.faithfreedom.org/op-ed/review-of-tamil-edition-of-understanding-muhammad/

And here is a negative review by a Muslim

http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2009/ali-sina-understanding-muhammad-a-psychobiography/

http://www.bibliaholic.com/review-of-understanding-muhammad-a-psychobiography-by-ali-sina/

Note that the author of this negative review, is Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi, the man who said Ali Sina must be killed.  He has not read the book. He has not addressed any of the arguments presented in the book.  He rehashes the same tired logical fallacies that Muslims present to prove Islam is true.   No Muslim who reads this book will remain a Muslim, not even MENJ.  Or maybe he will, after all he is a man of hate who loves violece and unabashedly advocates for Islamic supremacy.

I challenge Muslims to read the book and see if you can still write a rebuttal to it.  I will publish your rebuttal, and should you prove me wrong I will give you $50,000 in reward and announce my defeat.

Buy the fifth edition, which is a lot more complete than the previous one. However, if for any reason you can’t buy it, ask me and I will send you a PDF version of the previous edition. It’s not as complete but still good enough to make the point.

If you want me to publish your rebuttal, you should first meet me in Gchat where I will quiz you to make sure you have read the book.  This is because Muslims hate to read anything written against Islam but still want to prove it wrong, without knowing its content.

Translate

Questions & Answers

The Post you are about to read is true and is based on true research. This post will open the eyes of the reader and at worst will make you think?

Alisina.org ~ Everything You Need to Know about Islam

Understanding Muhammad

The fifth edition of Understanding Muhammad has 25% more content than the previous edition, including a new chapter that leaves no doubt about Muhammad’s psychopathology. ThIS edition is available only in hard copy. If for any reason you can’t get this book write to me and I will email you a PDF version of the previous edition.

Since September 11, 2001, there have been over 16,000 terrorist attacks, resulting in the deaths of hundreds of thousands of civilians and a lot more injuries, throughout the world. The perpetrators of these crimes were not monsters; they were Muslims. They were pious people who believed and acted in accordance with their faith. There are millions more who think like them and are ready to do the same.

If you think Islamic terrorism is a new phenomenon, think again. Islam owes its success to terrorism.  The prophet of Islam bragged, “I have been made victorious with terror“.  [Bukhari: 4.52. 220]  Since the day Muhammad set foot in Medina, he started his campaign of terror.  His followers have been doing the same ever since.

Muslims are intolerant, supremacist, bully, and violent.  They are highly inflammable and can explode if they are not treated preferentially and with respect.  At the same time, they abuse others.  This is psychopathology.

To understand Muslims, one must understand their prophet.  Muslims worship and emulate Muhammad.  Islam is Muhammadanism.  Only by understanding him can one know what makes them tick.

Understanding Muhammad is a psychobiography of Allah’s Prophet.  Historians tell us that Muhammad used to withdraw to a cave, spending days wrapped in his thoughts.  He heard bells ringing and had ghostly visions.  He thought he had become demon possessed, but his wife reassured him that he had become a prophet.  Convinced of his status, he was intolerant of those who rejected him, assassinated those who criticized him, raided, looted, and massacred entire populations.  He reduced thousands to slavery, raped, and allowed his men to rape female captives.  All of this, he did with a clear conscience and a sense of entitlement.

He was magnanimous to those who admired him, but vengeful to those who did not.  He believed he was the most perfect human creation and the universe’s raison d’être.  Muhammad was no ordinary man.  He was a psychopathic Understanding Muhammad, ventures beyond the stories.  Focusing on the “why” rather than the “what,” it unravels the mystique of the most influential and yet enigmatic man in history.

Muhammad believed in his own cause.  He was so certain of the reality of his hallucinations that he expected everyone to believe in them too.   He would make his Allah indignantly ask “What! Do you then dispute with him [Muhammad] as to what he saw?” (Q.53:12)  This is psychopathology.  Why should others believe in what he saw?  Wasn’t it up to him to prove what he saw was real?  Only a psychopathic narcissist expects others to believe in his claims without asking for evidence.

Muhammad was an orphan.  Spurned by his mother in his infancy and left in the care of a Bedouin couple, he had a loveless childhood.  He then passed to the care of his grandfather and uncle who took pity on him and spoiled him.  Not receiving love at a time he needed unconditional love and not receiving discipline when he needed to learn about boundaries, he developed narcissistic personality disorder, a trait that made him a megalomaniac bereft of conscience.  He fantasized about unlimited power, expected praise and admiration, believed he was special, and expected others to believe him and go along with his ideas and plans.  He took advantage of others, was jealous, yet believed others were jealous of him, and was hurt when rejected, even killing those who deserted him.  He lied and deceived, feeling entitled and justified in doing so. All these are traits of narcissistic personality disorder.

Thanks to another mental illness, temporal lobe epilepsy, the prophet of Islam had vivid hallucinations which he interpreted as mystical and divine intimations.   When he claimed he heard voices, saw angels and other ghostly entities, he was not lying.  He could not distinguish reality from fantasy.

Muhammad also suffered from obsessive compulsive disorder, causing his fixation on numbers, rituals and stringent rules.  OCD explains why he lived such an austere life and why his religion is filled with so many absurd rules.

In late life Muhammad was affected by acromegaly, a disease caused by excessive production of a growth hormone, resulting in large bones, cold and fleshy hands and feet and coarse facial features such as enlarged lips, nose and tongue. Acromegaly occurs after the age of 40 and usually kills the patient in his early 60s.  It causes impotence, while TLE increases libido.  This explains Muhammad’s sexual vagaries in his old age and why he had such an insatiable craving for sex.  He would visit all his 9 wives in one night to touch and fondle them, without having intercourse.  His impotence explains his insecurity, paranoia, and intense jealousy for his young wives. He ordered them to cover themselves, lest other men cast a lusting eye on them.  Today, half a billion Muslim women veil themselves, because Muhammad was impotent.  Muhammad’s illnesses explain a lot of mysteries of Islam.

The combination of all these psychological disorders and his unusual physiognomy made Muhammad a phenomenon that set him apart from ordinary people.  His uneducated followers interpreted his differences as signs of his prophethood.  Like devotees of all cults, they rose to champion his cause with dedication.  By defying death and butchering others they made Islam the world’s second largest religion, now the biggest threat to world peace and the survival of human civilization.

Why is it important to know Muhammad?  Because over a billion people try to be like him and do as he did. Consequently, the insanity of one man is bequeathed to all his followers.  It is by understanding him that we can see through them, and be able to predict these unpredictable people.

We live in a dangerous time.  When a fifth of humanity worships a psychopath, eulogizes suicide bombing and thinks killing and martyrdom are ultimate acts of piety, the world becomes a dangerous place.  When these people acquire the atomic bomb, the earth becomes a powder keg.

Islam is a cult. It is time to wake up and realize that this cult is a threat to mankind and there can be no co-existence with Muslims. As long as Muslims believe in Muhammad, they are a threat to others and to themselves.  Muslims must leave Islam, leave their culture of hate and join the rest of mankind as fellow humans, or non-Muslims must separate themselves from them, ban Islam, end the immigration of Muslims and send home those who plot against democracy and refuse to integrate.

Islam is incompatible with democracy.  It is a warring creed that uses democracy to destroy it and to establish itself as a worldwide totalitarian regime.  The only way to avert the clash between this barbarity and civilization and a world disaster, is to expose the fallacy of Islam and demystify it.  Muslims must be weaned from Islam for humanity to live in peace.

Understanding Muhammad is imperative for both Muslims and non-Muslims. This book makes that task easy.

Reviews of Understanding Muhammad

1 FJordman

http://www.jihadwatch.org/2008/10/fjordman-reviews-ali-sinas-understanding-muhammad.html

http://lionheartuk.blogspot.com/2008/10/fjordman-book-review-understanding.html

2-  Sujit Das

http://islammonitor.org/index.php?option=com_content&view=article&id=2436&catid=214

http://voi.org/28jun2009/sourced/faithfreedom/bookreview:understandingmuhammadapsychobiography.html

http://thewestislamandsharia.blogspot.com/2010/04/book-review-understanding-muhammad.html

3- Mahesh Prabhu

http://www.faithfreedom.org/features/book-review/understanding-muhammad-a-psychobiography-of-allah’s-prophet/

http://indiamahesh.folks.co.in/2010/07/an-impeccable-reassessment-of-islam’s-only-prophet/

4- Tamilian ex-Muslim

http://www.islam-watch.org/Library/Understanding-Muhammad-Tamil.htm

http://www.faithfreedom.org/op-ed/review-of-tamil-edition-of-understanding-muhammad/

And here is a negative review by a Muslim

http://www.bismikaallahuma.org/archives/2009/ali-sina-understanding-muhammad-a-psychobiography/

http://www.bibliaholic.com/review-of-understanding-muhammad-a-psychobiography-by-ali-sina/

Note that the author of this negative review, is Mohd Elfie Nieshaem Juferi, the man who said Ali Sina must be killed.  He has not read the book. He has not addressed any of the arguments presented in the book.  He rehashes the same tired logical fallacies that Muslims present to prove Islam is true.   No Muslim who reads this book will remain a Muslim, not even MENJ.  Or maybe he will, after all he is a man of hate who loves violece and unabashedly advocates for Islamic supremacy.

I challenge Muslims to read the book and see if you can still write a rebuttal to it.  I will publish your rebuttal, and should you prove me wrong I will give you $50,000 in reward and announce my defeat.

Buy the fifth edition, which is a lot more complete than the previous one. However, if for any reason you can’t buy it, ask me and I will send you a PDF version of the previous edition. It’s not as complete but still good enough to make the point.

If you want me to publish your rebuttal, you should first meet me in Gchat where I will quiz you to make sure you have read the book.  This is because Muslims hate to read anything written against Islam but still want to prove it wrong, without knowing its content.

Translate

Questions & Answers

Top of Form